Product BrainCurrent limits
Some decisions
still need a person.
Check what is verified, what is still being built and where a human remains responsible.
Why this? Who decides? What changed?
Assignment is not notification.
An assigned question records ownership. Do not assume it notifies the owner or automatically unblocks another task.
Broad autonomy is a goal.
A dependable unattended workflow needs configured execution, permissions, recovery and real proof. A written process does not establish it.
Possible clashes need judgment.
A flag points to a possible conflict. The owning roles decide how competing direction should stand or change.
Recorded reasons do not prove outcomes.
Owners and reasons can be recorded. Their presence does not establish that a decision sticks or improves the work.
Do not assume a complete ownership overview.
This version makes no promise of a complete who-owns-what overview. Inspect the actual records and current product behaviour.
No measured performance promise.
We do not claim measured improvements in speed, cost, happiness or model accuracy from these guides or our own use.
The first guides are made by hand.
Drafting, source checks and review are real work. No automated content engine or routine is implied by this collection.
No invented urgency.
Early access is not a reason to invent scarcity, countdowns, limited places or a promised outcome.
Customer evidence needs permission.
Named customer words need consent and exact attribution. Quotes express a perspective, not a measured result.
People accept the team’s direction.
Purpose, vision, strategy, objectives and key results require human acceptance. An agent can prepare the work.
Connections need current proof.
Support depends on the actual connected environment, role, instructions and permissions. Session behaviour and recovery need to be checked in the current setup; an older defect report is not a current capability verdict.